“The Mullard beats them all. It just has a lot more “body” to it.” Read
Share this post:
3 thoughts on “Mullard 6080 Mitcham”
I’ve been using Tung-Sol 5998 for quite a while and found it to be a very good sounding tube – relaxed, airy, transparent with great bass. Then I came across a few sets of Mullard 6080 tubes. These appeared to be genuine. Black spiky plates, made in Gt. Britain, Mitcham factory codes starting with R. I was very excited to try them out. So there they went – right into the amp. The music started, my brain froze and started to struggle with the information. At first I rejected my first impression, so I put Tung-Sol back – listened more and then Mullards. I couldn’t believe it, but Mullard tube sounded better!!!
It reproduced body of the sound in such a rich way that Tung-Sol sounded dry in comparison. Full, powerful, maybe not as transparent as Tung-Sol, but by just a tiny bit. The tube became my new reference tube. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.
I have a Mullard Mitcham rebranded Philips 6080 tube and it sounds weak. This compared to my Philips JAN 6080WC tube, it has better tonality and bass compared to the Mullard made tube.
I know you don’t like the 6080s in general, but everything I’ve read about the Mullard 6080, and based on my own experience, I have a feeling that either your tube is a problem or perhaps there’s something in your chain that doesn’t pair right with the 6080. If I remember correctly, you have a dark voice and use hd650s with it? If so the Mullard should sound just as the author above your post describes. It DOES need to be paired with a bright punchy tube to sound best (my favorite pairings so far have been with a syl vt231, ’52 sylv 6sn7gt, and a Raytheon vt231. On the other hand my two favorite driver tubes at the moment, a tungsram cv1988 and a brimar cv1988 sound uninspiring with the Mullard 6080. All 3 types have that beautiful liquidity that had drawn me to tubes in the first place. I find that when power and driver tubes are too similar in characteristics, they almost drown each other out. The DAC is also crucial..esp with the dark voice. I’m using a NAD D1050 which really makes my set up sing. Anyway, I encourage you to stick with the Mullard. It’s my favorite power tube of late (better than the 5998). A truly magical tube. And completely different than other 6080s which until the Mullard I generally disliked (although the Chatham 6080wc is a very good tube.. but not in the Mullard’s league)
I’ve been using Tung-Sol 5998 for quite a while and found it to be a very good sounding tube – relaxed, airy, transparent with great bass. Then I came across a few sets of Mullard 6080 tubes. These appeared to be genuine. Black spiky plates, made in Gt. Britain, Mitcham factory codes starting with R. I was very excited to try them out. So there they went – right into the amp. The music started, my brain froze and started to struggle with the information. At first I rejected my first impression, so I put Tung-Sol back – listened more and then Mullards. I couldn’t believe it, but Mullard tube sounded better!!!
It reproduced body of the sound in such a rich way that Tung-Sol sounded dry in comparison. Full, powerful, maybe not as transparent as Tung-Sol, but by just a tiny bit. The tube became my new reference tube. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.
I have a Mullard Mitcham rebranded Philips 6080 tube and it sounds weak. This compared to my Philips JAN 6080WC tube, it has better tonality and bass compared to the Mullard made tube.
Hey
I know you don’t like the 6080s in general, but everything I’ve read about the Mullard 6080, and based on my own experience, I have a feeling that either your tube is a problem or perhaps there’s something in your chain that doesn’t pair right with the 6080. If I remember correctly, you have a dark voice and use hd650s with it? If so the Mullard should sound just as the author above your post describes. It DOES need to be paired with a bright punchy tube to sound best (my favorite pairings so far have been with a syl vt231, ’52 sylv 6sn7gt, and a Raytheon vt231. On the other hand my two favorite driver tubes at the moment, a tungsram cv1988 and a brimar cv1988 sound uninspiring with the Mullard 6080. All 3 types have that beautiful liquidity that had drawn me to tubes in the first place. I find that when power and driver tubes are too similar in characteristics, they almost drown each other out. The DAC is also crucial..esp with the dark voice. I’m using a NAD D1050 which really makes my set up sing. Anyway, I encourage you to stick with the Mullard. It’s my favorite power tube of late (better than the 5998). A truly magical tube. And completely different than other 6080s which until the Mullard I generally disliked (although the Chatham 6080wc is a very good tube.. but not in the Mullard’s league)